Beginning with the Intermodal Surface
Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) of 1991, there has been an
incremental shift from straight transportation planning - meaning roads,
bridges, trains, etc. to expand into the area of community and
central economic planning. The Treasure Valley Partnership/Ada
Planning Grant Proposal described in the previous section was for the
Transportation and Community System Preservation Act (TCSP) which was a
program included under the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st
Century (TEA-21)
Public Law 105-178, Title 1, Section 1221.
The
Transportation and
Community System and Preservation Act (TCSP) was described on the
Federal Highway Administration website this way:
The Transportation, Community, and
System Preservation (TCSP) Program provides funding for a
comprehensive initiative including planning grants, implementation
grants, and research to investigate and address the relationships
between transportation, community, and system preservation and to
identify private sector-based initiatives.
States, metropolitan planning organizations, local governments, and
tribal governments are eligible for TCSP Program discretionary
grants to plan and implement strategies which improve the efficiency
of the transportation system, reduce environmental impacts of
transportation, reduce the need for costly future public
infrastructure investments, ensure efficient access to jobs,
services and centers of trade, and examine development patterns
and identify strategies to encourage private sector development
patterns which achieve these goals.
It's subtle, but it's there and if you
continue to look at the development of the metropolitan regional
governing structure, you will see the social planning unfold. From
the previous section, "Treasure Valley Partnership Goals":
2. Link
land use and
transportation
That's Planning and Zoning which is a
function of city or county government. In the creation of a
metropolitan governing structure, the administrative merger of these
functions across jurisdictions is the cannibalization of elected
representative government, replaced by a committee management structure
that exists at a higher level of power than the city government layers
being merged.
"Centers of trade" .... see
Trojan Triangles,
Trojan
Triangles - "The CORE"
Note also from the previous page that
it was the group, "Idaho Smart Growth Network" that informed the
Treasure Valley Partnership of the grant opportunity. Who are the
Idaho Smart Growth Network? They are the social change agents in
the community who masquerade as grassroots but who are really connected
with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Their purpose is
to facilitate the implementation of Agenda 21 principles into our local
communities while appearing not to be government central planners.
In other words, they have slithered into our communities riding (no pun
intended) on the backs of the transportation system planners.
|
On a parallel track, the
Brookings Institute
initiated their "Metro Program" in 1996.
Brookings is low profile, they are a very
important source for the globalism and communitarian cancer infecting
our nation.
About the
Metropolitan Policy Program
Created in 1996, the Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy
Program provides decision makers with timely trend analysis,
cutting-edge research and policy ideas for improving the health and
prosperity of cities and metropolitan areas.
The program is based on a simple premise: The United States is a
metropolitan nation. Metropolitan areas are home to 83 percent of
the U.S. population, 85 percent of the nation’s jobs and 92 percent
of all college graduates. They are our hubs of research and
innovation, our centers of human capital, and our gateways of trade
and immigration. They are, in short, the drivers of our economy, and
American competitiveness depends on their vitality.
Our work is designed to help metropolitan areas (and the cities and
suburbs within them) adapt to rapid economic, demographic, and
technological changes and ultimately achieve three goals that are
central for success in the new global order:
- Productive growth that boosts
innovation and entrepreneurship, generates quality jobs and
rising incomes, and helps the U.S. maintain its economic
leadership;
- Inclusive growth that expands
educational and employment opportunities, reduces poverty, and
fosters a strong and diverse middle class; and
- Sustainable growth that
strengthens existing cities and communities, conserves fiscal
and natural resources, and advances U.S. efforts to address
climate change and achieve energy independence.
To help metro areas, and thereby
the nation, prosper, the Metro program focuses on leveraging the
unique roles of federal, state and local actors, with the private
sector. Our work is also increasingly informed by lessons learned
from metro areas and nations abroad.
The elements of each one of the bullet points above can be seen in
the 'Redesign of Government' projects implemented by Al Gore and Bill
Clinton during the Clinton Administration.
Leadership council
- very, very important list of
perpetraitors
Brookings
Institute Report, "Mountain Megas" (Note,
there is also a Great Lakes Mega Report)
Excerpts from Chapter V. This
chapter is a must read
V.
FORGING A NEW
FEDERAL-MEGA AGENDA FOR THE INTERMOUNTAIN WEST
And so, as the approaching 2008
election decides upon a new administration in Washington, the
time is right for leaders around the Intermountain West to
propose a compact with the federal government that will allow
the region’s
pivotal megapolitan areas to overcome their common challenges
and assert their leadership in the nation and world.
What should this new compact or partnership look like? To begin
with, it should revolve around securing a young region’s
standing on the four core drivers of future prosperity—efficient
and strategic infrastructure links, potent innovation
capacity, high-potential human capital, and sustainable,
quality places—as well as on regional governance. But beyond
that, the new partnership should be characterized by a new tone
and stance—a fresh and pragmatic style that is more catalytic
than commanding, more empowering and facilitating than
micromanaging. ...Now is
the time for the region’s leaders to ask that the federal
government become a more constructive partner with state and
local governments and
the private sector in helping the region make crucial
investments in the region’s infrastructure and resource systems.
Help with direct investment will be critical, but so will
related policy and attitudinal adjustments aimed at setting up a
more supportive federal policy framework within which all
parties can work together to improve surface and air
transport and address pressing water and energy issues. Along
these lines, the Intermountain West has a particular interest in
helping work out new federal-state-mega partnerships through
which Washington will more constructively help to:
• Bring the transportation network to scale, smartly
• Proactively address enormous resource needs
|