Councils of Government
are few people who are not aware of President Eisenhower's
warning as he left office but how many people are aware of -
or have even thought of what Eisenhower meant when he said
the "Councils of Government"? In the public domain,
the focus is always on the military-industrial complex not
on the 'Councils of Government'. The entry in
is a classic example showing the veering off from the
subject of what Eisenhower was really saying:
Because Eisenhower was a General, he knew about
the military-industrial complex so he spoke about that - but
the 'Councils of Government' are not restricted to the
military-industrial complex. In fact, they are at
every level of government - and they are now in your
neighborhood - organizing to change your way of life - from
the American system of representative government - elected
by an independent, educated electorate to the communist
system of soviets: "The Councils of Government".
Americans have been miseducated as to the nature of
communism. It's not about ownership as much as it's
about the process of governing. It's the group
the individual. 'Councils of Government' is the
system of 'Public-Private Partnerships' is the Communitarian
System - is the Communist System.
As Eisenhower said - they are
ruthless in purpose and insidious in method.
They are the shadow government.
"Under socialism all will
govern in turn and will soon become accustomed to no one
governing" Vladimir Lenin
"Democracy is the wholesome and pure air without which a socialist public organization cannot live a full-blooded life." Mikhail Gorbachev
The "Councils of Government" that Eisenhower warned about
have progressed to the point that they succeeded in changing
the American system of government from a Republic to a
'Democracy'. As Gorbachev said above, it is a
requirement for the communist system to flourish. The
communist system in the U.S. became fully operational during
the Clinton Administration with the
of Government" initiative.
How "The System" Works
The figures on the right were
taken from the book, "Summitry in the Americas" by Richard
Feinberg. They depict the organization charts of the
people/groups who were represented in the discussions
leading up to and following the 'Summits of the Americas'.
The summits are the
incremental steps toward the North American Union -
which is the dissolution of the United States as a nation.
The working groups work outside
the bounds of government, outside of public view and without
oversight. Government representatives in the groups are the
lower level - deputy directors and below that are under the
radar in terms of media attention.
The business community
Chamber of Commerce,
Council of the Americas,
Canadian Council for the
"Competitiveness Council". (Note that the business
community funds many front groups to give the appearance of
wide appeal on various issues. They also give grants
to buy the support of universities and scholars to support
their positions. While the supposed interests of the
front groups vary - the purpose is the same - to support the
positions of the business community that provides their
Chamber press release.
include groups like "Smart Growth". The
'Smart Growth' network of "environmental activists" was
actually started by the EPA in 1996 and they fund them using
EPA grants. Masquerading as grassroots activists, they
are free to use government grant money to participate
in the implementation of the collectivist system - eroding
the American system of representative government.
Special Interest groups for hispanics have an interest in increasing their political power base by erasing the borders and eliminating 'citizenship' are supported by the business community who profit from the cheap labor. This would include racist groups like La Raza - (The Race) and Maldef., etc. Plus there are special interest groups for foreigners - also funded by business to disenfranchise citizens and devalue citizenship - "Compete America".
The communist - collectivist system is not so much a political philosophy as it is institutionalized corruption. At it's essence, it is legalized gangs (stakeholders) using the force of law and police state to steal from - and control non-gang members. The proponents of this system (the gangs) argue that they just want citizen participation. The fraud of that - is that there is not time enough in the day for the average person to live, have a family, work and participate in all of the gangs that have a hook into government and their hands in the Treasury - that will affect his life in very direct way.
The implementation of 'Sustainable Development' provides classic examples of the institutionalized corruption of the collectivist system of gangs. In 1993, Bill Clinton signed Executive Order 12852 establishing the 'President's Council on Sustainable Development' to oversee the implementation. 'Sustainable Development' is not simply a conceptual label to conserve the environment. It is major United Nations program called Agenda 21. It covers all aspects of life - how you live on this planet, the use of your property, the redistribution of wealth, the products you buy in the store (if you have any money left) . If you are a non-gang member, you have no idea that is the case so you are inclined to think that sustainable development is a good idea. This is what Eisenhower was talking about when he said, "ruthless in purpose and insidious in method".
Even the way the meetings of the gangs are conducted is dishonest. Group psychology is used to control the agenda and the outcomes are determined before the meetings ever begin.
A good example of the institutionalized corruption was the implementation of Agenda 21 in Idaho. Local public officials were induced to form a private partnership and were guided to apply for an EPA grant. The EPA gave them $500,000 of your tax money - TO LOBBY THEMSELVES in their public capacity! (See 1997 and 1998 - Treasure Valley Partners).
Another example was the North American International Trade Corridor Partnership NAITCP. The 'Partnership' provided a way to pay off local officials to participate in projects and programs that are - in this case, against the interests of their country. The NAITCP no longer exists as an organization. They merged with NASCO - no doubt to give cover to the Mayors who participated in the illegal and treasonous activities of partnering with a foreign government - against the interests of America and American citizens.
A history of William Reilly's experience with 'gangs' at the EPA is another example of how the corruption of government works to break down the rule of law.