|
North American Union What Is It? |
||||||
|
|||||||
The concept of the North American Union is exactly the same as the European Union. In Europe it began as the Common Market. Using the ploy of 'free trade' and the promise of increased prosperity, the people of Europe were persuaded to give up economic sovereignty to a higher level authority called the European Union. Look at the European Union and substitute "North American" for European. Substitute the names of European countries for the states of the United States plus the countries of the Americas. |
|
||||||
In the history of the European Union (link above), it states:
Miami - "NAFTA - Will it ever have a European Union Profile?" Carving a path to [North American] regional governance - "customs union". On November 29, 1994, Congressman Bill Richardson placed a speech titled "Free Trade for the Americas: Next Steps" by Ambassador Abelardo L. Valdez into the Congressional Record. In the speech, Valdez says the following:
|
|||||||
Punta del Este, Uruguay in 1967 The first summit on the North American Union was held in Punta del Este, Uruguay in 1967. The idea right from the start was to create a Common Market - integrating the economies, first of the Latin American countries and then the North American countries. DECLARATION OF THE PRESIDENTS OF AMERICAS Latin America will create a common market. "THE PRESIDENTS OF THE LATIN AMERICAN REPUBLICS resolve to create progressively, beginning in 1970, the Latin American Common Market, which shall be substantially in operation in a period of no more than fifteen years. The Latin American Common Market will be based on the complete development and progressive convergence of the Latin American Free Trade Association and of the Central American Common Market, taking into account the interests of, the Latin American countries not yet affiliated with these systems. This great task will reinforce historic bonds, will promote industrial development and, the strengthening of Latin American industrial enterprises, as well as more efficient production and now opportunities for employment, and will permit the region to play its deservedly significant role in world affairs. The ties of friendship among the peoples of the Continent will thus be strengthened." "Economic integration demands a major sustained effort to build a land transportation network and to improve transportation systems of all kinds so as to open the way for the movement of both people and goods throughout the Continent; to establish an adequate and efficient telecommunications system; to install inter-connected power systems; and to develop jointly international river basins, frontier regions, and economic areas which include the territory of two or more countries." Remarks at the 36th Annual Washington Conference of the Council of the Americas
Secretary Condoleezza
Rice SECRETARY RICE: Thank you. Thank you very much, Bill, for that wonderful introduction. You're a good friend and I appreciate the nice words. Thank you. Let me also thank Susan Segal and Eric Farnsworth for their leadership of the Council. This organization's strong commitment to active U.S. leadership in the Americas, of course, began with David Rockefeller and David, you are a force and we appreciate your commitment and the inspiration that you've had for this organization, but also for U.S.-Latin American relations. Thank you. |
Public Enemy No. 1
David Rockefeller
“We are
grateful to the Washington Post, The New York
Times, Time Magazine and other great publications
whose directors have attended our meetings and
respected their promises of discretion for almost
forty years. It would have been impossible for us
to develop our plan for the world if we had been
subjected to the lights of publicity during those
years. But, the world is now more sophisticated
and prepared to march towards a world government.
The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual
elite and world bankers is surely preferable to
the national auto-determination practiced in past
centuries."
Rockefeller Internationalism |
||||||
Hemispheric Integration |
|||||||
To really understand how all this came about requires that one go back and follow the international agreements and legislation forward. The following is a brief timeline of the most significant events. A more complete timeline is available on the front page of this section of the website. 1972 - Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment This agreement called for cooperation between countries on their border regions. It was following this declaration that Rockefeller initiated the formation of the Trilateral Commission. [More on the Trilateral Commission] 1981 - U.S.-Mexico Binational Commission was established by Ronald Reagan 1983 - Ronald Reagan signed the La Paz Agreement creating an international zone in our border states. The La Paz Agreement was a stepping stone to harmonize laws and to integrate U.S. Government departments with Mexican Government Departments. 1988 - Canada-US Free Trade Agreement (CUSFTA) is signed by Ronald Reagan and Brian Mulroney. 1994 - North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) becomes effective 2001 - George Bush and Vincente Fox launch the U.S.-Mexico Partnership for Prosperity Joint Statement - September 6, 2001 More - scroll down for dates Sept 4th thru Sept 7th. State Dept: Partnership for Prosperity. |
La Paz Agreement - Border Region
President Ronald Reagan |
||||||
|
|||||||
The initiatives identified in the Security & Prosperity Partnership (SPP) are really not new. The SPP is simply the public announcement of the integration (dissolution of our sovereign nation). The steps they take from this point on can't be hidden and can't be done in stealth mode as they have done everything else. Case in point, the failure to protect our borders and the failure to enforce our laws as it pertains to the invasion of our country by Mexican foreign nationals. It's all part of the process of breaking our nation. Because the idea that our own government officials would commit national suicide is so repugnant and unthinkable, it is useful at this point to look at statements from official government websites so that we can be assured that it is real and not just some wild imaginings of 'conspiracy theorists'. Caution: Since the 1980's, language has been used to mask the truth of what is being discussed. The use of the word 'partnership' is case in point. It sounds friendly and nice - neighborly. You have to peel off the mask of language and use the real words the words that accurately describe what they are talking about. "Partnership" means integration - integration of law and the functions of our governments - which by definition means the disintegration of national sovereignty. |
Jerome Corsi filed a Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) request for documents relating to the Security & Prosperity Partnership. He received over 1,000 documents that can be viewed HERE. |
||||||
Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America Joint Statement - North American Leaders Unveil 'Partnership' North American Partnership Offers Agenda of Prosperity North American Partnership Offers Agenda of Security SPP.Gov - Partnership in Treason Website Canada - Partnership for Prosperity Trade and Integration of the Americas Vincente Fox - Address to Congress on September 6, 2001 U.S. State Department - Issues for the 107th Congress (2001)
U.S. Treasury - Press Release - April 15, 2002 (PO-2095) Inter-American Agreements, Conventions and Other Documents
|
Judicial Watch also submitted a FOIA for the Organization Chart and Contacts for the SPP. This information was found in PDF form and can be seen HERE.
Robert Pastor, Council on
Foreign Relations (CFR) Building A North American Community (PDF) Trinational Elites Map North American Future [PDF]
THE COMING NORTH AMERICAN PARLIAMENT
|
||||||
More coming soon.... Why are they doing it? Apparently the elites and executives of the multinational corporations believe that the concept of 'nation' is quaint and old fashioned. They believe that somehow they can make the world work under a single global system of 'rules' and 'best practices' handed down from the sapiential circles of Davos and Geneva to non-governmental. social change agents (we call them public-private partnerships) - using 'development' money as the carrot and police state information technology and a globalized military of Special Forces soldiers as the stick. |