|
At
this point, the export of American wealth should
be obvious to all. But the other side of it
- the importation of communism has not been so
obvious primarily because the American people were
mis-educated as to the nature of communism.
If you ask, most people will respond that
communism is a system in which the government owns
everything and the economy is centrally planned.
That description is only partially true. In
reality,
Communism is feudalism in an industrialized,
modern state and people are the chattel of the
Overlords.
The 'system' of communism is institutionalized
theft and corruption, gang (group) warfare against
the individual - suppression of initiative and
self-expression, social conditioning, forced
deference to state planning (police state) and the
pathologies that result from what is in effect,
state-run slavery. You as a "worker" are a
factor of production. In the communist
system, you are a forced worker - a slave for the
state and of course, slaves can't own property and
can't accumulate wealth. All you can do is
survive on the meager dole of the state as
remuneration for your assigned position in the
state monopoly.
The
Marshall Plan
The United States had a good idea 60 years ago -
'The Marshall Plan'. Unfortunately,
once the bureaucracy was in motion towards the
goal of the Marshall Plan, it became the mission
of the U.S. government rather than temporary
assistance for the war torn countries of Europe.
In just 60 short
years, they've been able to accomplish through
central economic planning what military might
would never have been able to do - they are
bringing down western civilization... grinding it
under heals of global communism. When
Khrushchev said, "we will bury you", he wasn't
kidding. The irony is that the Soviets
aren't burying us - we are committing national
suicide at the hands of the traitors and criminals
within.
Very simply, following World War II, the
infrastructure of Western Europe was in shambles
and as a result the economies of the European
countries were in shambles. The
original idea was to have Germany pay punitive
reparations for the costs to the world for the
German Nazi movement:
"In Potsdam in July, British Prime
Minister Clement Attlee, Soviet Premier
Joseph Stalin, and Truman set their
common goals—the four Ds—for Germany:
democratization, denazification,
demilitarization, and decartellization
(the break-up of trusts and industrial
conglomerates). Germany was also to pay
reparations for war damages; a total
benchmark figure of $20 billion in cash
and in kind was discussed, with $10
billion going to the Soviet Union.
Because most of Germany's industrial
capacity lay in the Ruhr Valley and thus
outside the Soviet Zone, the Allies
agreed that for reparation purposes
Germany, considered within its 1937
boundaries (minus territories ceded to
Poland and the Soviet Union), was to be
treated as an economic unit with central
administrative organs for the four
zones. Reparations in kind—the
dismantling of factories and compulsory
export of manufactured goods and
foodstuffs—fit the stated purpose of JCS
1067 as well as the overall Allied
policy of punishment and retribution for
postwar Germany. This agreement was
fraught with pitfalls, but in the summer
of 1945, few Americans worried about the
long-term political and socioeconomic
consequences of such a policy toward
Germany nor how western concepts of
democracy and free enterprise might
co-exist with the Soviet-style one-party
rule and a state-run economy." Robert A.
Selig,
America's Long Road to the Federal
Republic of Germany (West)
Then, somebody gave serious thought to Stalin and
the Communist Soviet Union to the east:
"The Soviet Union derived its raison
d'être from the ideology of
Marxism-Leninism; Stalin's world was a
bipolar one of antagonistic and mutually
exclusive ideologies and their ancillary
political and economic systems. The
antagonism would eventually be overcome
through world-revolutionary violence,
which made Stalin's regime expansionist
by definition. Even before the war with
Nazi Germany was over, Stalin had
already accepted the possibility of a
future conflict of ideologies with the
west. In April 1945 he told Yugoslav
communist Milovan Djilas: "This is not a
war as in the past: Whoever occupies a
territory will also determine its
societal system. Everyone introduces his
own system as far as his own army can
advance. It can't be any other way."
A
deindustrialized and demilitarized Germany would
have been a sitting duck for Stalin and his
ambitions. If Germany fell
to communism, then the rest of western Europe
would fall because the functioning Soviet industries
would move to fill the gap of the destroyed industries of the
west bringing the communist system with them. As a result, the
"Economic Recovery Act of 1948" - The Marshall Plan
- named for
George C. Marshall because he proposed the idea at
Harvard in 1947 - became the authorization for post-war
recovery assistance.
Excerpts from a
State Dept article titled,
"The Marshall Plan, A Strategy That Worked":
"Kennan
and his new State Department Policy
Planning Staff produced one of the
master documents from which the Marshall
Plan eventually flowed.... But there was
a specifically European dimension to the
Marshall effort. Europe's evil genie,
said people like Kennan, Assistant
Secretary of State Dean Acheson, and
future ERP Ambassador Averell Harriman,
was nationalism. If that root of
Nazi-fascism and other 20th-century
rivalries could be bottled up in an
integrated European economic framework,
the resulting prosperity might dampen
nationalist competition, prevent future
armed conflicts, and obviate U.S.
involvement in future European wars."
The above State Department document
contains many important details concerning the
Marshall Plan, but there is a bit of spin in it.
The writer says that the twin objectives were
modernization and integration but a more
accurate description that gives a clearer
definition of the objectives with respect to past
and current events is 'Security and Prosperity'.
Prosperity through the breakdown of national
barriers for economic integration and collective
security for the western European countries.
In other words, the goal was to create a United
States of Europe. And the U.S. State
Department had a major role in the planning and
implementation of it. (Continuing excerpts).
...After a
long winter of discussion, some stopgap
help, and greatly increased tension in
East-West relations, the European
Recovery Program was born officially
with an act of Congress signed by
President Truman in April 1948. To
administer the project, a new federal
agency, the Economic Cooperation
Administration (ECA), was established.
Truman, a Democrat, signified his intent
to secure bipartisan support for the
program by appointing a Republican,
Studebaker automobile company CEO Paul
G. Hoffmann, as ECA head. Expenditures
began to flow immediately, under tight
congressional supervision.
The
program's official enactment identified
the supreme objective as creating in
Western Europe "a healthy economy
independent of extraordinary outside
assistance" by 1952. To this end,
comments the economic historian Immanuel
Wexler, "the act stipulated a recovery
plan based on four specific endeavors:
(1) a strong production effort, (2)
expansion of foreign trade, (3) the
creation and maintenance of internal
financial stability, and (4) the
development of (European) economic
cooperation."
In Europe
the clash of imported and native models
provided the energy to set the great
1950s boom going. The European Recovery
Program had supplied the spark to set
the chain reaction in motion. In 1957
came the Treaty of Rome, which launched
the European Economic Community.
Although this scheme of fledgling
economic integration was far less
radical than the American visionaries of
1949 had demanded, of the inheritance
left by the Marshall Plan and its
promises, none was more concrete. This
founding document initiated Europe's
peaceful economic integration, a process
that continues to this day.
The Blueprint
A declassified State
Department report titled, "Summary
of the Department's Position on the Content of a
European Recovery Plan" provides an overview
of objectives, requirements and issue areas for
the reorganization of the economic and political
systems of Europe.
Noteworthy
excerpts:
-
Essential
Elements. Concrete proposals for
area-wide recovery of agriculture and
basic industries -- coal, steel,
transport, and power -- which are
fundamental to viable European economy.
-
Progressive replacement of bilateral
trading arrangements by more effective
multilateral arrangements for
expanding intra-European trade, looking
if possible, toward an eventual European
Customs Union.
-
"While in
many respects the long-run gains of
European economic integration in terms
of specialization of production and
economic location -- achieved ideally
through both a customs and a currency
union -- would be the most
beneficial consequences of a recovery
program, these goals must be put in
perspective in relation to more urgent
short-run needs.
-
Role of
the UN. "Department
supports fullest practicable use of
United Nations bodies and specialized
agencies in carrying out of program.
This includes continued international
allocation of coal through ECE Coal
Committee and food through IEFC
Committees, and technical planning work
in ECE Committees on transport and
power. Sympathetic to assignment
to ECE of additional functions related
to program. But Dept recognizes
that coordination of European program
and integration of UN activities
with needs of this special program will
probably have to be retained in
organization composed only of
participants (including bizonal
Germany). In view possibilities
systematic obstruction to ECE
effectiveness, special European
recovery organization must be able to
handle entire program and must be
prepared to assume promptly functions
assigned to other organizations if they
prove ineffective.
-
Continuing
Organization. Dept recognizes that
present Conference cannot possibly make
complete
blueprint
for European recovery over next several
years. Initial program must
conform to all above elements, but many
details of its application will remain
for further study. Modifications
are also to be expected during
negotiations with the U.S. before
acceptance and in continuing development
of any accepted program. Emphasis
should be given to major role of
continuing organization of participating
countries (plus bizonal German area),
both in implementing and in
progressively refining any agreed
program.
A more detailed view
of the State Department's Blueprint for European
Recovery is contained in a document that was in
the files of John Snyder of the Treasury Dept.
This document is titled, "The
Marshall Proposal of Assistance to Europe",
dated July 10, 1947.
Excerpts:
The flow
of goods may be impeded by
insurmountable obstacles to trade.
These problems are being dealt with by
the I.T.O., but it is possible that
specific regional arrangements
applicable to certain parts of Europe
may establish definite areas of "freer
trade". This cannot,
however, be a short-run development; and
then it is well not to forget that today
the most formidable hindrances to
normal trade are found in the foreign
exchange regulations and the dwindling
monetary reserves, necessitating a cut
in imports - hindrances which should be
partially, if not wholly, removed by the
application of the Marshall programme.
Main
Objectives of American Policy:
-
Restore an international
monetary system of sufficient
stability for the most rigid
controls to be removed
-
Reduce trade barriers to
foreign trade, in particular
quantitative restrictions and
various obnoxious forms of
discrimination (one of the
provisions of the lend-lease
agreements and now the
principal objective of the
International Trade
Organization)
-
To contribute by sound loans
to the reconstruction of
war-stricken countries (one of
the objectives of the
International Bank for
Reconstruction and
Development)
[Different
Stages of Tackling the problem.]
The methods of coordination applied by
the European countries participating in
the Marshall programme will be decided
upon at the July meetings in Paris.
The first task will be to prepare a plan
for action in the autumn of 1947.
But only a limited number of problems
will find their solution at so early a
date. There are, of course,
greater tasks confronting the European
countries, including such questions
as a freer movement of population, which
may more easily be solved on a regional
basis for Europe than for the world as a
whole.
Isador
Lubin and Wassily Leontief
Isador Lubin was an Economist and a statistical
genius who was hired by the government during the
New Deal era to provide the government with
statistics and analyses that were the foundational
support for the New Deal programs.
Roosevelt appointed him to the Bureau of Labor
Statistics in 1941. His role
in the Marshall plan was documented in a 2005 BLS
article titled, "BLS
and the Marshall Plan: the forgotten story".
Excerpts:
"Prior to
and during the Second World War, Lubin
was assigned an office in the White
House West Wing and served as special
statistical advisor to President
Franklin Roosevelt".
"Lubin had
authorized BLS to create a small
research unit at Harvard University in
1941; the unit under the direction of
Wassily Leontief, constructed the first
official input-output table.
Leontief's new technique employed a
system of double entry bookkeeping that
tabulated the transactions of any one
transactor group industry with all other
groups. It included the flow of
intermediate as well as final output.
[ Note: English translation is
that he compiled supply chain tables of
industry inputs and outputs. The
reports from these statistics allowed
them to selectively target one component
in a production process because it would
stop the entire chain of production.
For instance, coal is an input to the
steel industry and steel is the output.
If you don't have coal, you can't make
steel.]
The
technique had proved useful to the
Office of Strategic Services during the
war, helping to pinpoint bombing targets
of those German industries crucial to
the war effort. Its earliest
domestic application had been an
estimate made in 1944 for the Planning
Division of the War Production Board".
[Wiki
history of the OSS: On
the suggestion of Canadian spymaster
William Stephenson, the senior
representative of British intelligence
in the western hemisphere, Roosevelt
directed Stephenson's friend
William J. Donovan, a World War I
veteran, Medal of Honor recipient and
New York lawyer, to draft a plan for an
intelligence service. Donovan was
employed to evaluate the global military
position in order to offer suggestions
concerning American intelligence
requirements because the US did not have
a central intelligence agency. After
submitting his work, "Memorandum of
Establishment of Service of Strategic
Information," Gen. Donovan was appointed
as the "Co-ordinator of Information" in
July, 1941.]
Donovan
was a member of the New York City
"Establishment," a powerful Wall Street
lawyer and a Columbia Law School
classmate (1908) (but credited to 1907)
of Franklin D. Roosevelt, although they
were not close at the time.
Donovan
forged ahead, though, and began to lay
the groundwork for a centralized
intelligence program. It was he who
organized the COI's New York
headquarters in Room 3603 of Rockefeller
Center in October, 1941 and asked
Allen Dulles to head it; the offices
Dulles took over had been the location
of the operations of Britain's MI6.]
President Franklin
Roosevelt appointed Isador Lubin as
Minister to the Allied Reparations
Commission in 1945 after recognizing
Lubin’s current service on the War
Production Board, his experience with
the War Industries Board during World
War I, and his intimate knowledge of the
mistakes that had led to hyperinflation. 21
[Note:
There is a discrepancy between the BLS
account and the American Presidency
Project. BLS says Roosevelt
appointed Lubin - but the
APP says that
Truman appointed Lubin on April 27,
1945. Roosevelt died on April 12,
1945.
When I was
researching 9/11, I found a video
named, 9/11 - Creating the Myth.
They had a clip of Jerome Hauer so I
researched him. I found an article
written by a woman named Theresa.
"Hauer seems to
specialize in the art of holding down
several different jobs at the same time.
While he started to work for the NIH in
September 2001, he remained a Managing
Director at
Kroll Associates - the official
security and bodyguard company for all
American presidents since World War II.
Kroll Associates is also the security
company for the Sears Tower."
[Kroll Link: Kroll
Associates, a security
consultant firm, which was
renamed to Kroll Inc. in
August 2001, started in New
York City in 1972. In December
1997, Kroll merged with
armored car manufacturer
O'Gara-Hess & Eisenhardt to
form
The Kroll-O'Gara Company.
http://www.krollworldwide.com
O'Gara is responsible for
the security of all
US-Presidents since 1945.
However the background of
Kroll is very interesting,
too: In 1993, Maurice
Greenberg's American
International Group (AIG ->),
became co-owner of the
"private spy agency", Kroll
Associates, as a result of
rescuing Kroll from bankruptcy
with a cash infusion. Kroll
was notorious during the 1980s
as the "CIA
of Wall Street" due to the
prevalence of former
CIA,
FBI, Scotland Yard,
British secret service and
British Special Air Service
men Kroll employed for
corporate espionage in
takeover bids, as well as for
destabilization of foreign
nations.
The immediate issue
facing Lubin, therefore, was an approach
to the handling of German reparations in
a way that would not further devastate
Germany’s industrial productive
capacity. He knew that German industry
was central to the recovery of Western
Europe, but that its importance had to
be measured in commodity terms in order
to be effectively noninflationary. To
tackle the problem, Lubin needed
standardized measurements, that is,
statistical data on the reparations
Germany could afford, the state of
German industrial capacity, and the
living standards of the German
population. For answers, he turned
to BLS,
of which he was still technically the
Commissioner....
The Truman
Administration. During the early
days of the Truman Administration, in
the postwar period, there had been some
debate as to how best to seek a remedy
to the devastation that had engulfed
Western Europe. Two schools of thought
emerged. 13
One, known as the “fundamentalist”
approach, favored the granting of
charity and loans to these countries and
the continuing implementation of the
efforts of the United Nations Relief and
Rehabilitation Administration.
A second approach, motivated by
enlightened self-interest, was forwarded
by American big business and gained
influence within the Administration.
Known as the “progressive” approach, it
reasoned that if America could tutor
Europe in the techniques of American
productivity, the problem would be
permanently solved.14
The progressives also looked to a
tariff-free and integrated European
economy as a solution to postwar
recovery. It was the belief of
U.S. Under Secretary of State William
Clayton that Europe’s interwar failure
to keep pace with American economic
growth had sprung from national
rivalries, which had led to tariff
restrictions throughout Europe and
constraints on international trade.
America viewed European markets as too
local and advocated their integration
and expansion. It was a belief shared by
Lubin.
A key component of the
Marshall Plan, put forward in 1947,
called for cooperative meetings of the
16 European nations who would be its
beneficiaries. These nations met in
Paris in 1947 and formed what came to be
known as the Organization for
European Economic Cooperation. It
was the belief that this Organization
would unanimously determine what
Europe’s economic needs would be and
help give shape and substance to the
Marshall Plan. Chief among the issues
to be resolved would be the opening of
tariff-free European markets to the
products of American industry.
[Wiki Refer
back to William Donovan:
In 1949, he became chairman of
the newly-founded
American Committee on United
Europe, which worked to
counter the new Communist
threat to Europe by promoting
European political unity.
Wiki: The American Committee on United Europe (ACUE), founded in 1949, was an American organization which sought to counter the Communist threat in Europe by promoting European political integration. Its first chairman was ex-wartime OSS head, William Joseph Donovan.[1]
Declassified American government documents have shown that the ACUE was an important early funder of both the European Movement and the European Youth Campaign. The ACUE itself received funding from the Rockefeller and Ford foundations.
The U.S. policy was to promote a United States of Europe, and to this end the committee was used to discretely funnel CIA funds - by the mid 50's ACUE was receiving roughly $1,000,000 USD per year - to European pro-federalists supporting such organizations as the Council of Europe, the Schumann plan, and the proposed West European army.[2]
"Lubin was named U.S.
Representative to the Temporary
Subcommittee on the Economic
Reconstruction of Devasted Areas, which
was created by the Economic and
Employment Commission of the United
Nations Economic and Social Council,
serving from 1946 to 1949. He was one of
the group of State Department officials
who saw Germany as the key to the
integration of Europe. They felt that
German unity could not be achieved
without the unity of Europe, and that
the unity of Europe could best be
approached “crabwise” through technical
cooperation in economic matters.
These ideas were the beginning of the
concepts that led to the Marshall Plan
proposal.25"
Treaties Uniting
Europe
Information and
links from the website named, "Treaty
of Rome". Compare these treaties to the
plans listed above in the Top Secret State
Department reports that were produced in 1947:
Link to history
of the 'Treaty
of Paris':
The ECSC
Treaty was signed in Paris in 1951 and
brought France, Germany, Italy and the
Benelux countries together in a
Community with the aim of organising
free movement of coal and steel and free
access to sources of production. In
addition to this, a common High
Authority supervised the market, respect
for competition rules and price
transparency. This treaty is the origin
of the institutions as we know them
today.
"Thus the idea of pooling
Franco-German coal and steel
production came about and the
European Coal and Steel
Community (ECSC) was formed.
This choice was not only
economic but also political,
as these two raw materials
were the basis of the industry
and power of the two
countries. The underlying
political objective was to
strengthen Franco-German
solidarity, banish the spectre
of war and open the way to
European integration.
The French Foreign Minister,
Robert Schuman, in his famous
declaration of 9 May 1950
, proposed that Franco-German
coal and steel production be
placed under a common High
Authority within the framework
of an organisation in which
other European countries could
participate."
Treaty of Rome - 1957.
The Six (referring to Belgium,
the Federal Republic of Germany, France,
Italy, Luxembourg and the Netherlands)
decided, on 25 March 1957 with the
Treaty of Rome, to
build a European Economic
Community (EEC) based on a
wider common market covering a whole
range of goods and services.
Jumping to the
present day website of the
State
Department:
Policy
Planning Staff
Mission Statement
Fusing Thought With Action: The
Mission and Purpose of the Policy
Planning Staff
Created in
1947 by George Kennan at the request of
Secretary of State George C. Marshall,
the Policy Planning Staff (S/P) serves
as a source of independent policy
analysis and advice for the Secretary of
State. The Policy Planning Staff's
mission is to take a longer term,
strategic view of global trends and
frame recommendations for the Secretary
of State to advance U.S. interests and
American values.
In his
memoirs Present at the Creation, former
Secretary of State Dean Acheson
characterized the role of Policy
Planning: "To anticipate the emerging
form of things to come, to reappraise
policies which had acquired their own
momentum and went on after the reasons
for them had ceased, and to stimulate
and, when necessary, to devise basic
policies crucial to the conduct of our
foreign affairs."
The summation of my
analysis of the information above is as follows:
The United Nations
started out with a covert mission directed by the
State Department to break down the sovereignty of
European nations for the purpose of facilitating
the business interests of America's industrialists
- most specifically the Rockefeller Empire.
After the war, the Office of Strategic Services
became the CIA and was connected to the
Rockefeller Empire via William Donovan. It
would appear that the mission of the CIA was
actually industrial espionage - the information
from which was fed into the Input-Output Systems
of Leontieff and the BLS. That
information was used to set both American domestic
policy and Foreign Policy executed through the
cover of the UN as directed by the State
Department Policy Planning Staff and by the CIA
when the Jackals were needed to convince "the
target" of the wisdom of going along with the
State Dept. (Rockefeller - UN) policy.
- To Be Continued -
|
