The Owego-Apalachin Central
School District (Owego, NY) created a "task force" to
investigate whether or not to "have a relationship with the
International Baccalaureate Organization."
IBO Task Force
Final Report, November 20, 2004
pdf for download:
Retrieved copy from Internet Archive
Original Link (not available)
http://www.oacsd.org/BOE/IBOTaskForce/TaskForce.pdf
The Owego-Apalachin Central
School District (Owego, NY) created a "task force" to
investigate whether or not to "have a relationship with the
International Baccalaureate Organization."
The Task Force recommendation was to "discontinue
affiliation with IBO, and not implement the Middle Years
Programme and the Primary Years Programme ..:" -- main
reasons cited:
"-- Lack of
community support, due to issues with the
Philosophy of IBO, as well as IBO contractual
concerns
-- Further affiliation with IBO will continue to
cause division within the community, and school
budget support will be impacted"
The report, which includes a list of pros/cons of IB,
information on test scores, costs, general program elements;
IB vs. AP, etc.
Here are some of the "con" issues cited by the Task
Force:
- Budget Concerns
- People must focus on cut backs
- Program costs for 2003/2004 $71K
- Additional layers of management required
- MYP/PYP coordinators for each school
- Takes Highly experienced teachers out of
Programs (High School) to meet IBO requirements
- Grading Issues
- Lack of Homework & Test Scores Brought home
- Governing Law Swiss Law
- IBO can not be held accountable for quality of
teaching
- Authorization to teach IB program may be
withdrawn if IBO is not satisfied that the school
is delivering the program with sufficient quality
Decision is final & Not subject to appeal
- IBO is independent from school
- In the case of MYP or Diploma Program: It is the
sole right and responsibility of IBO to award MYP
Certificate or IB Diploma; NOT the school
- Formal agreement to bind school to full
acceptance of IBO Philosophy, standards,
principles & practices
- IBO reserves the right to deny participation to
any school whose philosophy, policy or practices
are judged to be incompatible with those of IBO
- Potential Constitutional Violations of 13th
Amendments
- Potential Violation of Federal Law 20 U.S.C.
§1232h) Sex or family life education
- Questionable terminology (Why these terms?)
- Homo Faber
[Deb's
note: "Homo faber, in Latin means 'Man
the Smith' (or 'Man the Maker', 'Man the
Toolmaker', 'Man the Fabricator', 'Man
the Worker')" -- Source:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_faber
]
- Community Colleges currently have no policy
regarding IB credits
- AP credits more easily accepted at college level
- There is no consistence policy for determining
credit Given for IB courses at colleges that
accept the IB program
- IBO conflicts with programs such as AP, and
SUPA. If we were to continue with IBO these other
programs would be reduced or eliminated.
Excerpts from the report (underline emphasis added):
Task Force Findings:
During the IBO/MYP review, activities of the
Task Force were conducted in a variety of ways. At
many of the meetings, the committee discussed
concerns and issues as a whole. The Task Force
also formed sub-committees to study individual
topics and report back to the Task Force as a
whole. Visitors from the public, in attendance,
were asked at the start of each meeting if they
had information they wished to share with the
committee. The Survey sub-committee created two
surveys, one for the community and non-educators
and another for the faculty. The surveys were
approved by the whole committee and distributed at
District Open Houses and to faculty and staff at
each district facility by committee members. The
number of general surveys returned to the
committee and faculty surveys was 150 and 75
respectively.
The following statements summarize the main
findings of the Task Force:
1. The Task Force noted a number of educational
practices used in the middle school during the one
year MYP trial that are recommended by nationally
recognized authorities. These commendable
practices included use of a flexible scheduling
format, team interdisciplinary teaching,
and curriculum development based on Understanding
By DesignŠ.
2. The Task Force found that some elements of the
OACSD middle school program were not part of a
standard MYP program and were confused by the
public with the MYP plan. (Note: See Best
Practices Comparison Chart in Appendix)
3. Teacher members of the Task Force reported that
course content during the MYP year was not
substantially different from content in the same
courses taught in prior years.
4. Adoption of the MYP in grades 6-10 may have
an impact on course offerings in grades 11 and 12
(e. g. AP and community college credit courses).
5. In order to become certified as an MYP/PYP
school the school district and school board
must be willing to cede some of its authority to
an extra-national organization. And, according
to the terms of the legal agreement between the
local school district and the International
Baccalaureate Organization, disputes between
the school district or its enrolled students would
be subject to international arbitration rules
whose arbiters would have final authority on MYP.
6. The International Baccalaureate Organization is
linked to the United Nations and UNESCO and
shares the goals, ideals and objectives of those
organizations.
7. The Task Force found the district¹s cost
estimates for introducing the MYP/PYP programs
during the next five years to be substantial
but not extreme. In-service training costs for
staff to learn other programs would be similar.
(Note: See Cost Table Report in appendix)
8. Based on Task Force survey data the MYP/PYP
programs are not well understood by and do not
enjoy broad support among members of our
community. Faculty support for the MYP is mixed.
(Note: Survey data can be found in the appendix).
9. Based on the total experience of our community
with the MYP concept, a solid base of support for
the program does not appear to exist among
stakeholders. Conversely, there appears to be a
dedicated and active group of stakeholders who are
opposed to further use of MYP program for the
foreseeable future.
10. The Task Force concluded that overall, the
district¹s plan for introducing and communicating
to our community about the MYP was inadequate if
not flawed.
Task Force Committee
The idea for creating a task force to study
the International Baccalaureate Organization and
the Owego Apalachin Central School District¹s
affiliation with the organization was conceived in
the spring of 2004. A number of parents and
community members were beginning to speak out at
Board of Education meetings about their
disagreements with the Middle years Programme
and/or the lack of knowledge of the program. In
June 2004, four parents met with Superintendent
Dr. Willon where it was agreed that 15 members of
the community including parents and educators
would review the International Baccalaureate
Organization and its programs.
The parents who initially met with Dr. Willon were
Dan Cacciaglia, Robert Anderssen, Sandy Williams
and Becky Goodrich. The reasons for the creation
of the committee were:
• Poor communication between the OACSD and
our community about the Middle Years Programme
• Belief that the OACSD had failed to
investigate the International Baccalaureate
Organization thoroughly and without a sufficient
shared decision making process,
• Budget related concerns with regard to the
implementation of the IBO¹s programs
• Parents and community members who were in
disagreement about the program¹s teaching
methodology
• Concern over the background and
political agenda behind the International
Baccalaureate Organization and disagreements
among parents and community members regarding the
philosophy, ideology, values and terminology
used by the Organization.
|