Administrative Coup d'Etat
The World's Greatest Heist and Betrayal
A trade agreement with India having to do with knowledge jobs and Information Technology using 'terrorism' as the reason is a Great Non Sequitur.
Between U.S. and
November 9, 2001
"Since September 11, the people of the United States and India have been united as never before in the fight against terrorism. In so doing, they have together reaffirmed the enduring ties between both nations, and the importance of further transforming the U.S.-India relationship. In their meeting, President Bush and Prime Minister Vajpayee discussed ways to accelerate progress towards these goals.
They noted that both countries are targets of terrorism, as seen in the barbaric attacks on September 11 in the United States and on October 1 in Kashmir. They agreed that terrorism threatens not only the security of the United States and India, but also our efforts to build freedom, democracy and international security and stability around the world. As leaders of the two largest multi-cultural democracies, they emphasized that those who equate terrorism with any religion are as wrong as those who invoke religion to commit, support or justify terrorist acts."
December 1, 2005
NASSCOM - February 2001
"More than 250 Fortune 1000 US companies now depend on Indian IT companies for their mission critical work," said Richard F Celeste, US Ambassador to India.
"The partnership between India and the US has strengthened into a 'relationship' today because we share common values and devotion to democracy. This relationship is enabled by the revolution in technology and Internet," he said.
"This is a kind of DNA infusion from Indian subcontinent to the United States. The percentage of Indian graudates coming to the US is increasing every year and more number of these students are coming back to India to work," said Celeste. He was speaking at the Nasscom 2001 international IT conference in Bombay recently."
Lou Dobbs - Firms
outsourcing knowledge jobs
In 2004, Treasury Secretary John Snow gave a speech to the National Press Club in which he stated that in 2000, the Equity Markets collapsed taking $7 TRILLION dollars out of the economy.
An American TRAITOR named Harris Miller was instrumental in setting up the United States (economy) to be gutted like a fish. From approximately 1996 until 2001 he was working both sides of the ocean - working with the Indians to establish environments and acquire outsourcing customers while at the same time he was lobbying the American congress for increased H-1B imported foreign workers because of the 'shortage' of tech workers for the dot.con tech boom.
the export of our high technology jobs was done in secret as
explained by WIPRO Chairman Azim Premji while “speaking at a
seminar organised by the All India Management Association (AIMA)
and Bombay Management Association (BMA)”.
What I hear in these two segments is extortion. Coburn either doesn't hear it, or he's a good actor.
On September 10, 2001, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld held a press conference to disclose that over $2,000,000,000,000 in Pentagon funds could not be accounted for. Rumsfeld stated: "According to some estimates we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions."
Rumsfeld: We have absolutely no information that any U.S. aircraft shot down any other aircraft today.
Q: I wonder if we could just ask Senator Levin one thing, Senator, if that's all right.
Levin: You bet.
Rumsfeld: Senator Levin, you and other Democrats in Congress have voiced fear that you simply don't have enough money for the large increase in defense that the Pentagon is seeking, especially for missile defense, and you fear that you'll have to dip into the Social Security funds to pay for it. Does this sort of thing convince you that an emergency exists in this country to increase defense spending, to dip into Social Security, if necessary, to pay for defense spending -- increase defense spending?
Levin: One thing where the committee was unanimous on, among many, many other things, was that the -- we authorized the full request of the President, including the $18 billion. So I would say that Democrats and Republicans have seen the need for the request.
A House Budget Committee hearing was held on October 6, 2004
to discuss options for changing the U.S. system of taxation.
John Spratt (D-SC) said, as of the end of
fiscal year 2003 revenues were at their lowest point since 1950. The
revenues were only 16.2% of GDP Rep John Linder (R-GA) said, "there
has been 8 quarters in a row of declining revenues since
John Spratt (D-SC) said, as of the end of fiscal year 2003 revenues were at their lowest point since 1950. The revenues were only 16.2% of GDP
Rep John Linder (R-GA) said, "there has been 8 quarters in a row of declining revenues since 2001".
Rep. John Linder, "there is six trillion dollars offshore".
In a July 2004 hearing of the House Budget Committee CBO Director Douglas Holtz-Eakin gave very important testimony regarding how the CBO calculates projections of the economy for the Congress to use to make decisions.
Listen to the questions of Jim Nussle and John Spratt and listen closely to Holtz-Eakin's response - especially the information that CBO receives from the Treasury on tax receipts.
Yesterday the CBO published their August update. The
chart was produced as described above.
Note: This budget outlook was presented on C-Span with what appears to be a brighter outlook on the economy.
Congressional Budget Office in
2006 Economic Outlook 8/17/2006
The Director said that it was due to a surprise increase in corporate tax revenues. He doesn't mention the fact that in 2005 Congress bribed the multinational corporations to repatriate some offshore profits:
The one-time, one year only boost to tax revenues will allow the cover-up of the decimation of the tax base to continue for a few more years because of the way the CBO does it's calculations.
Computer Systems Analyst, what I hear in these audio clips
is that the Treasury and the IRS are willfully withholding tax revenue
data from Congress. There is no plausible reason why
the Congress shouldn't have actual tax revenue numbers
(including breakouts) plus estimated numbers for the
individuals who file for extensions by about August of the
current tax filing year.
In 1987 all employers who had over 500 employees were required to report the employer copy of W2 statements on magnetic tape. Every year the IRS was lowering the number of employees to force employers to use tape. By about 1990, probably all employers with over 100 employees would have been required to report W2's on tape.
Employers are required to give employees their W2 statements by Jan. 31. The employer is required to send the tape copy of the W2's to the IRS within a few weeks of when the employee gets their statements.
W2's and filing deadlines account for the vast majority of individual filers. For people who are self employed that file for extensions, an estimated number could be used based on their prior years filing. That would still be a better number than 3 year old data.
Putting all the above in the
context of historical events of the past decade listed
below, it is this Analysts opinion that:
What they are doing with the 3-year old data, projecting history and then projecting forward is accounting fraud to cover up the biggest heist in world history and an administrative coup d'etat on the United States government using the government accounting and control (FBI and NCIC and immigration systems) as the proverbial gun to the head to retain power while they dismantle our institutions and infrastructure and destroy our country.
You can see the results of their projections by looking at the Annual Accountability Reports for Social Security that I accumulated in 2004. Note the fact that the Social Security Administrator puts the following CYA disclaimer in the foreward on page 2: When you contrast these statistics with what John Spratt said about the true revenue numbers for 2001 that were made available in 2004, you can clearly see the extent of the misrepresentation of the status of the economy.
“We believe the performance and financial data presented in this report are complete and reliable as outlined by the guidance available from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
The major events to enable the coup are as follows:
) During the 1990's Alan Greenspan kept interest rates artificially low to fuel the tech boom which was in reality just a manufactured illusion. The Fed was in control of the markets since 1987 when the Brady Commission recommended it. In addition, Greenspan advised the Congress that the U.S. needed to import more workers because of 'shortages' due to both the illusory tech boom and to control inflation which he redefined to mean rises in worker salaries rather than the traditional definition of rises in price. The 8 year expansion of the economy (that was fraudulent) plus using the accounting scam of withholding current data from the Congress gave roughly a 10 year time frame in which our economy could be drained of economic wealth while allowing the fraudsters to claim a 'booming' economy based on projections from old data. We are just at the point now - in 2006 where the lost revenues to the treasury can no longer be covered up.
) Clinton sold out our
country by signing the WTO and
NAFTA agreements. The WTO agreement includes a
'Generalized Preference' in trade with so-called developing
countries which includes China, India and Mexico. In
effect, Clinton was selling our country out from under us
when he signed those agreements. They were designed to put
domestic American businesses at a greater disadvantage over
'developing' countries over and above our already higher
labor and production costs. Then the Congress gave tax
credits to corporations to move out of our country so they
could take advantage of the trade preferences in third world
countries while selling back into this country - putting
domestic businesses out of business. In addition, these
agreements included provisions for the 'free movement of
workers' across borders which was a sell out of the American
workers. The imported workers have been used to engage in
labor arbitrage against American workers on our own soil.
|Statements made by Senator Byron Dorgan (D-ND) on C-Span while talking about his book, "Take This Job and Ship It: How Corporate Greed and Brain Dead Politics Are Selling Out America. Click the links below for the audio clip.|
The US imported $26.7bn worth of goods from 133 developing countries under the Generalised System of Preferences programme in ’05. The 32-year-old trade programme, which must be renewed periodically, waives import duties on thousands of products from the developing countries.
'India, China to own 2/3 of world capital by 2050'