Map Source |
The text of the agreement was
found on the
U.S. Embassy Mexico City
website. It is no longer
there but a copy of it was
recovered from the Reagan
Library website.
La Paz Treaty.
|
|
The 1983 La Paz
Agreement/Border XXI
Signed by Presidents Ronald
Reagan and Miguel de la Madrid
in 1983, this breakthrough
agreement established a
framework for cooperation on
environmental problems that
has been carried forward by
subsequent presidential
administrations in Mexico and
the U.S. The U.S.
Environmental Protection
Agency and Mexico's Ministry
of Environment and Natural
Resources (formerly SEMARNAP,
now SEMARNAT) are jointly
charged with searching for and
implementing solutions to
problems related to air, water
and land pollution along the
border. The commitment made in
La Paz has lead to two
multi-year initiatives, most
recently the ambitious
Border XXI Program. This
effort brings together
virtually all U.S. and Mexican
Federal, state and local
entities that are responsible
for environmental and natural
resource management in the
border region. It places
particular emphasis on public
inputs, decentralization of
environmental management and
improved communication and
cooperation among officials at
all levels.
The U.S. Mexico Binational
Commission Since 1981, a
Mexico-U.S Binational
Commission has provided
stewardship over the broad
array of bilateral issues. The
BNC draws cabinet-level
officials and other agency
chiefs into intensive
one-or-two-day discussions on
an
annual basis. It brings into
high relief unresolved issues
dividing the two countries and
provides opportunities to
discuss remedies. BNC meetings
frequently lead to
breakthrough agreements and
occasion brainstorming which
lead to innovative programs
designed to manage affairs in
a broad range of border
issues.
The BNC currently has 13
working groups and subgroups,
which reflect the political,
economic, law enforcement,
social and environmental
issues forming the fabric of
U.S. Mexico relations. |
|
The next step was to find the
La Paz Agreement since
this arrangement traces back
to it.
|
|
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA AND THE
UNITED MEXICAN STATES ON
COOPERATION FOR THE PROTECTION
AND IMPROVEMENT OF THE
ENVIRONMENT IN THE BORDER AREA
The United States of America
and the United Mexican States,
RECOGNIZING the importance of
a healthful environment to the
long-term economic and social
well-being of present and
future generations of each
country
as well as of the global
community;
RECALLING that the Declaration
of the United Nations
Conference on the Human
Environment, proclaimed in
Stockholm in 1972, called upon
nations to collaborate to
resolve environmental problems
of common concern;
NOTING previous agreements and
programs providing for
environmental cooperation
between the two countries;
BELIEVING that such
cooperation is of mutual
benefit in coping with similar
environmental problems in each
country; ACKNOWLEDGING the
important work of the
International Boundary and
Water Commission and the
contribution of the agreements
concluded between the two
countries relating to
environmental affairs;
REAFFIRMING their political
will to further strengthen and
demonstrate the importance
attached by both Governments
to cooperation on
environmental protection and
in furtherance of the
principle of good
neighborliness; Have agreed as
follows:
....
ARTICLE 4
For the purposes of this
Agreement, it shall be
understood that the "border
area" refers to the area
situated 100 kilometers on
either side of the inland and
maritime boundaries between
the Parties.
ARTICLE 8
Each Party designates a
national coordinator whose
principal functions will be to
coordinate and monitor
implementation of this
Agreement, make
recommendations to the
Parties, and organize the
annual meetings referred to in
Article 10, and the meetings
of the experts referred to in
Article 11. Additional
responsibilities of the
national coordinators may be
agreed to in an annex to this
Agreement. In the case
of the United States of
America the national
coordinator shall be the
Environmental Protection
Agency, and in the case of
Mexico it shall be the Secretaria de Desarrollo
Urbano y Ecologia, through the
Subsecretaria de Ecologia.
ARTICLE 9
Taking
into
account
the
subjects
to be
examined
jointly,
the
national
coordinators
may
invite, as
appropriate,
representatives
of
federal,
state and
municipal
governments
to
participate
in the
meetings
provided
for in
this
Agreement.
By mutual
agreement
they may
also
invite
representatives
of
international
governmental
or
non-governmental
organizations
who may be
able to
contribute
some
element of
expertise
on
problems
to be
solved.
The
national
coordinators
will
determine
by mutual
agreement
the form
and manner
of
participation
of
non-governmental
entities.
ARTICLE 14
Unless otherwise agreed, each
Party shall bear the cost of
its participation in the
implementation of this
Agreement, including the
expenses of personnel who
participate in any activity
undertaken on the basis of it.
For the training of personnel,
the transfer of equipment and
the construction of
installations related to the
implementation of this
Agreement,
the Parties may agree on a
special modality of financing,
taking into account the
objectives defined in this
Agreement.
|
|
1972 Declaration of the United
Nations Conference on the
Human Environment
What the La Paz agreement did
was to establish a fiefdom
headed up by unelected
government employees - giving
them virtually unlimited power
to expand their areas of
responsibilities with the
power to recruit an army of
non-governmental organizations
(NGO) to lobby for them.
Essentially the areas included
in the La Paz fiefdom were
commandeered from the states
through which it runs.
As I read this, my
understanding is that the
border region became a
separate and independent
international zone between
Mexico and the U.S.
Effectively, they were
internationalizing the EPA
with this agreement.
They also provided a means to
get financing outside the
normal funding streams of the
U.S. Congress - like from the
United Nations for example or
from private donors like David
Rockefeller.
This is UN
regionalization - divide and
conquer.
Regionalization is a
cannibalizing force against
representative government.
It usurps power (and property
in this case) from elected
officials - giving it to
unelected and unaccountable
committees and commissions.
This is the communist system
of governance - appointed apparatchiks
working in soviets to
determine and implement policy
and regulations (law) by fiat.
So in effect, the EPA was a
Herald Patch - a cancerous
seed of international
communism in our country.
Expanding Areas of
Responsibility
Any organization - government
or corporate that has the
authority and money to expand
areas of responsibilities will
do so. The La Paz
Agreement gave the fiefdom of
the border region that power.
Supposedly, the mandate of the
EPA is health of the
environment so the next power
partner to add was Health and
Human Services. And of course,
working in an international
zone with an international
body, they had to establish an
international section of their
department.
Office of
Global Health Affairs
Regional Affairs - The
Americas
|
|
U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services - Global
Affairs Office
U.S.-Mexico Border XXI Program
The Border XXI Program is a
binational, interagency
program aimed at protecting
and improving the environment
and environmental health,
while fostering sustainable
development in the U.S.-Mexico
border area. The objectives of
the Border XXI Program include
public involvement,
decentralization of border
decision making, and
increased cooperation between
the different governmental
agencies operating in the
border region. The program is
implemented through
nine binational Workgroups
that integrate the efforts of
other participating entities
and define specific projects
to achieve the Program's
objectives. The
Workgroups are committed to
encouraging active state
participation in their
endeavors and exploring
additional mechanisms to
promote border community
participation and
integrated regional planning.
The six Workgroups (1-6 below)
that were initiated under the
La Paz Agreement are (1)
water, (2) air, (3) hazardous
and solid waste, (4) pollution
prevention, (5) contingency
planning and emergency
response, and (6) cooperative
enforcement and compliance.
Recognizing that the
environment needs to be
considered from a
comprehensive perspective,
Border XXI integrates three
new Workgroups. These are (7)
environmental information
resources, (8) natural
resources, and (9)
environmental health. |
|
BORSTAR
This one was really clever.
They embedded this group
within the Border Patrol
itself giving the agency two
diametrically opposing tasks.
No doubt the ultimate goal
was/is to completely eliminate
the law enforcement side of
the Border Patrol in a
strategy rather like the
Invasion of the Body Snatchers.
As an aside, one has to wonder
if this is what happened to
other government agencies -
like the
FDA and the USDA.
From Daneen Peterson's
article:
TJ
Bonner, president of
the National Border
Patrol Council, the
union representing
border agents said
the Border Patrol's
official pursuit
policy handcuffs
agents in the field
. . .
The administration
is trying to
intimidate
front-line agents
from doing their job
. . . If they can't
do it
administratively,
they'll do it with
trumped-up criminal
charges."
Sara
A. Carter,
Breaking the
silence: Convicted
border agent tells
his story, August
8, 2006,
DailyBulletin.com,
http://www.dailybulletin.com/news/ci_4141562
|
|
Expansion and Binational
Efforts
(06/09/2003)
An agreement to expand BORSTAR
along the southwest border was
one of the agreements reached
during a series of meetings
between the United States and
Mexico regarding binational
efforts to promote border
safety. BORSTAR Teams began
providing binational training
to Mexican officers in the
year 2000. In 2001, team
members shared basic skills
and knowledge with more than
400 Mexican law enforcement
officials. Binational training
addressed basic search and
rescue, first aid, land
navigation, basic technical
rescue, and aquatic safety
techniques. Binational
training to enhance public
safety near the border has
already produced dramatic
results: In the last year,
1,200 people were rescued.
BORSTAR Teams are now in place
in each of the nine southwest
border sectors. BORSTAR is an
integral part of making the
border safer. The expansion
and increased resources
devoted to BORSTAR continue to
illustrate the Border Patrol's
commitment to safety and the
preservation of human lives.
|
|
Centers for Disease
Control (CDC) -
Border 2012 Program (next
edition of Border XXI) |
|
In 1983, the federal
governments of the United
States and Mexico signed the
La Paz Agreement for the
protection, improvement, and
conservation of the
environment on the U.S.-Mexico
border. The border region was
defined as the area within 62
miles (100 Km) on either side
of the geographic border
separating the two countries.
Nine years later,
environmental authorities of
both countries released the
Integrated Border
Environmental Plan (IBEP),
which involved six workgroups
including: Air, Water,
Hazardous and Solid Wastes,
Pollution Prevention,
Contingency Planning and
Emergency Response, and
Enforcement. The
implementation of the IBEP was
criticized because the public
was not asked to help develop
the plan and because little
attention was given to natural
resources and environmental
health issues. These
identified shortcomings led to
the Border XXI Program, which
ran from 1996 to 2000. Then in
2001, the U.S. and Mexican
agencies ex+plored ways to
improve binational
environmental planning efforts
in the region and created the
Border 2012 program to address
environmental issues in the
region for the next 10 years.
CDC’s Environmental Hazards
and Health Effects Program (EHHE)
has been and continues to be
active in environmental health
activities along the
U.S.-Mexico border. EHHE,
the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA)
[external
link], and other
federal agencies are involved
in the Border 2012 program to
address environmental health
issues along the U.S.-Mexico
border. Information on the
Border 2012 program can be
found at
http://www.epa.gov/usmexicoborder/
[external
link].
Public Health News and
Information - Nov. 2001
(No. 43)
|
|
If you look at the
'Security and Prosperity
Partnership' website and
you look at their 'working
groups' you see that they
correspond to the working
groups mentioned throughout
the La Paz and successor
agreements.
U.S. Mexico Environmental
Program: Border 2012
Border 2012 Framework
"Strategy for Indicator
Development - 2012"
This is also a good example of
newspeak. Indicators are
datapoints for measurements of
success(or failure). So
presumably this document is
the strategy for defining new
elements to measure in the
integration of the U.S. and
Mexico into a regional
nothingness - because it sure
as hell won't be the United
States of America by the time
they are finished.
Ross Perot was right about the
sucking sound, but he was
wrong about the scope.
It wasn't just productive
economic activity that was
being sucked in the abyss it
was the U.S. government and
national sovereignty that was
and is being sucked into the
international abyss.
This agreement and fiefdom of
the border region created
divided loyalties within the
U.S. government itself -
the enemy within - dividing
and conquering while we slept.
|
|
|
|