Nationalized Medical Records on the Internet ~ The End of Privacy ~
|
||||||
In 1993 when
President Bill Clinton appointed Hillary to lead a committee
to reform the U.S. healthcare system, republicans went
into overdrive on the campaign to ensure that the effort was
stopped. We were treated to visions of socialized medicine,
high cost, low quality, rationed care and a bureaucratic
nightmare. Yet, in 2004 when President George W. Bush
started down the same path by signing Executive Order 13335[1]
establishing the position
of the National Health Information Technology Coordinator,
nary a word was heard from either side - left or right.
Nationalization of medical records is a critical first step
to a national health care system. And if a national
health care system isn’t the purpose, then what is? |
||||||
BackgroundIn 1990, Senator John Glenn, Chairman of the Governmental Affairs Committee made a request of the GAO to study the potential benefits of automation of medical records and the factors that would inhibit the implementation. In January of 1991, the GAO presented the results of their study to the Committee[2]:
That paragraph gives the real reason behind the nationalization of medical records so no matter what else is said, the real reason for nationalized medical records is medical research. Initially, it was to analyze outcomes, but over time as we’ll see below, they’ve taken the slippery slope towards human medical research allegedly for disease prevention.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxOn October 19, 1992, Health and Human Services Secretary Louis W. Sullivan, issued a press release[3] announcing:
|
Excerpts from Executive Order 13335: By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and to provide leadership for the development and nationwide implementation of an interoperable health information technology infrastructure to improve the quality and efficiency of health care, it is hereby ordered as follows: Sec. 2. Policy. In fulfilling its responsibilities, the work of the National Coordinator shall be consistent with a vision of developing a nationwide interoperable health information technology infrastructure that: (a) Ensures that appropriate information to guide medical decisions is available at the time and place of care; (d) Promotes a more effective marketplace, greater competition, and increased choice through the wider availability of accurate information on health care costs, quality, and outcomes; (e) Improves the coordination of care and information among hospitals, laboratories, physician offices, and other ambulatory care providers through an effective infrastructure for the secure and authorized exchange of health care information; and(f) Ensures that patients' individually identifiable health information is secure and protected. (Ha!) Sec. 3. Responsibilities of the National Health Information Technology Coordinator. (a) The National Coordinator shall, to the extent permitted by law, develop, maintain, and direct the implementation of a strategic plan to guide the nationwide implementation of interoperable health information technology in both the public and private health care sectors that will reduce medical errors, improve quality, and produce greater value for health care expenditures. (iii) Evaluate evidence on the benefits and costs of interoperable health information technology and assess to whom these benefits and costs accrue; (v) Not assume or rely upon additional Federal resources or spending to accomplish adoption of interoperable health information technology; and (a) The Director of the Office of Personnel Management shall report within 90 days of this order on options to provide incentives in the Federal Employee Health Benefit Program that will promote the adoption of interoperable health information technology; and(b) Within 90 days, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and the Secretary of Defense shall jointly report on the approaches the Departments could take to work more actively with the private sector to make their health information systems available as an affordable option for providers in rural and medically underserved communities.
* *
* * *
* "Last year, the President
made the use of health information technology a key
principle of his health care agenda. On April 27, 2004, the
President signed Executive Order 13335 (EO) announcing his
commitment to the promotion of health information technology
to lower costs, reduce medical errors, improve quality of
care, and provide better information for patients and
physicians. In particular, the President called for
widespread adoption of interoperable electronic health
records (EHRs) within 10 years so that health information
will follow patients throughout their care in a seamless and
secure manner. This means that their medical information is
available to the right people at the right time, while
remaining protected and secure. The President has tasked HHS
with making this vision a reality by 2014. The goal can be
met, but there are major challenges to be faced, and the
path forward requires a concentrated nationwide effort to
achieve widespread adoption of interoperable EHRs."[6]
Mike
Leavitt, HHS |
|||||
Clearly, the project was already in process beginning in the first Bush Administration. The only mistake the Clinton Administration seems to have made is that he put a lightening rod in charge of it - namely Hillary Clinton. But the National Automated Medical Records system was only one piece of a much larger project that would ultimately bring about the transformation of the United States and in fact, the world - but in this writer’s opinion, the transformation is not for the better because the dark side potential far outweighs the good. As we know, there was such an uproar from the Republicans that Clinton's project for the health care system was dismantled, but the truth is that it continued - just without the high profile because the project was part of a much larger project of virtual governance - eGovernance - privatization of government behind the mask of the Internet. And it wasn't just a national project, it was international as I described in a previous report on the Global Information Infrastructure (GII). When you combine the concept of the GII with the Clinton-Gore 'New Federalism' which is 'market-based governance by network', you should be able to see the Big Picture of the plan for a fascist world system of "market-based governance" - United Multinational Technology Corporations behind the facade of a puppet national government.George Picks Up the Mantle
|
||||||
In 2001, George Bush announced
his intent to nominate
Bruce P. Mehlman to be Assistant Secretary of Commerce
for Technology Policy.
If you know how to decode the language, you'll find that most of the Bush Administration proposals for health care have to do with Health Information Systems - not health care per se. And when actual health care involving doctors is mention, it is rural, community health care but, it appears to this analyst - based on a lot of reading, that these facilities will be experimental pilot programs for telemedicine[8] for the poor - not real health care with real doctors in real doctor's offices. 2002 - Unveiling the Plan |
||||||
2002 George Bush's Plan for "Health Security"[9]
2002 Health Security Plan FAQ Sheet[10]
2002 - Bush Appoints Elias Zerhouni and Richard Carmonas[12]
Health IT - "Federal Drug Benefit Inspires Integration Work"
And under the guise of providing prescription drug coverage for seniors, Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003[14] legislation allowed them to begin the process of redesigning the health care system to enable live fire medical research, "genetically based, personalized medicine, and the segregation of targeted populations for the research:
In October 2003, Bruce Mehlman left government service to become the Executive Director of the Computer Systems Policy Project[15] (CSPP). Excerpt from the Press Release:
|
2002 Nomination of It's my honor to nominate two fine men to head important government institutions, to take important jobs. My nominee to lead the National Institute of Health is Elias Zerhouni, and my nominee as the next Surgeon General is Richard Carmona. These are distinguished physicians who have worked tirelessly to save lives, and to improve lives. They bring exceptional knowledge and skill to these critical jobs. And they are absolutely dedicated to improving the health and well-being of all Americans. Leading the NIH is a great responsibility, and I have picked the right man to do so. Dr. Zerhouni and his wife immigrated to America from Algeria with $300 in their pocket, but a dream of opportunity. Today he is the Executive Vice Dean of the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, the Chairman of the Department of Radiology and Radiological Science at Johns Hopkins, and a Professor of Radiology and Biomedical Engineering. He is an expert in biomedical research, and is committed to extending his benefits to all Americans, and all humanity.
The National Institutes of Health is entering a new era of medical promise. NIH researchers recently cracked the genetic code, an amazing achievement with enormous potential benefits. New diagnostic tools are alerting patients when they have an elevated risk of certain diseases, so they can take an active role in preventing them. New treatment therapies will be tailor-made for an individual's genetic makeup. And many medical treatments will become less invasive.
American medicine is on the verge of dramatic progress against AIDS, against diabetes and against heart disease. We're closing in on cancer's cause and cancer's cure. The anthrax attacks against American citizens also demonstrated the need to strengthen our defenses against bioterrorism. Medical research will improve our ability to identify and respond and treat infectious diseases, whether they occur naturally or are used as terrorist weapons. Dr. Zerhouni is well-prepared to manage this rapidly growing institution during times of great new opportunity and urgent biodefense needs. He has supervised research at Johns Hopkins, one of our nation's leading research facilities. One former colleague calls him a quadruple threat: a doctor who excels at teaching, researching, patient care and management. Dr. Zerhouni shares my view that human life is precious, and should not be exploited or destroyed for the benefits of others. And he shares my view that the promise of ethically conducted medical research is limitless.
....As an Army Green Beret in Vietnam, a decorated police officer in Pima County, Arizona, a SWAT team member, a nurse and a physician, Dr. Carmona has redefined the term, hands-on medicine. Dr. Carmona currently serves as the Clinical Professor of Surgery and Clinical Assistant Professor of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Arizona. He is also the chairman of the state of Arizona Southern Regional Emergency Medical System. He will bring to the Surgeon General's Office a proven commitment to service, and a strong management background.
The next Surgeon General will address three particularly urgent issues. First, the Surgeon General administers the 5,600-member Public Health Service Commission Corps, health care professionals who are on call for emergency duty. Members of this force were deployed in New York and Washington, D.C. after the terrorist attacks of September the 11th, and during the anthrax attacks that followed.
By now they are beginning to
present the real agenda of health care reform which is the
nationalized, networked system of medical records. This has
nothing to do with health care. It has everything to
do with Health Information Systems.
"Virtual Medicine -
health care by internet"
Which includes
the capability to perform medical research on people without
their knowledge - especially when you have unqualified
providers on the front lines - with the patients.
Top US biologists oppose biodefense boom[16] And maybe that explains this: 88 Dead Scientists & Microbiologists[17] Worst Cover Up in the History of the Military
"Novelli and Garry Neil, MD, Johnson & Johnson's corporate vice president for science and technology, said advocates should make policymakers aware of the huge "return on investment" from biomedical research. "Congress is always thinking cost containment ...and we need to figure out how to frame our arguments in cost containment ways," Neil said. "We continue to see health care as a cost center and a cost driver; instead we should be seeing it as a productivity generator, as an engine for growth." Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Andrew C. von Eschenbach, MD, agreed, "Investments in biomedical research ... are going to be the drivers of the economy in the next two decades." He said advocates must argue, "This is not an appropriation-this is an investment in our present and in our future." [18]
|
|||||
EXTRA! EXTRA! Read All About It - Medical Records ON THE INTERNET |
||||||
John Q
Is
YOU!
|
Medical Record of John Q. Citizen 06/24/2005 Patient Visit Patient reports being very cranky nearly all the time. He says he's become a PITA to be around because he has a PITA. Examination reveals a giant, red swollen hemorrhoid near the anal opening. Recommend surgery to remove hemorrhoid. |
|||||
Posterior View |
|
There are just some things in life you don't want to see - and you sure as hell don't want to share. |
||||
Note: the above demonstration was to get your attention, concerning your medical records and your privacy. Your interactions between your doctor and yourself should remain absolutely private - between you and your doctor and nobody else. |
||||||
In August of 2006, George Bush signed Executive Order 13410[20] calling for "a nationwide interoperable health information technology infrastructure" In 2007, Senator Ron Wyden introduced legislation for the next phase of "health care reform". The legislation was titled, "Healthy Americans Act". In 2008, Wyden issued a press release saying that the plan would be revenue neutral in 2014 and would produce surpluses thereafter. (Note: it will only produce surpluses if they commit medical genocide). xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx In 2007, at the National Governor's Conference, the plan was presented to the Governors by Ginny Wagner of IBM and Dr. Douglas Woods of the Mayo Clinic. In 2008, a lobbying group called "Research America" held a forum to "game" the ideas of what should be done to the health care system in the next decade or so. This forum begins to address the issue of using the American population (their networked medical records) for medical research. Also in 2008, Republican Party Suck Up Governor Butch Otter proposed and the Idaho State Legislature approved legislation authorizing a health information exchange with internet access to medical records and the 'Idaho Health Data Exchange' was born. The HDE is a non-profit corporation. When I found out about the Idaho HDE, I contacted them immediately to find out how to opt out. The form was sent to me by email: Idaho Health Data Exchange Opt Out Form The way the instructions read, it sounds as if health care providers will automatically send your medical record information to the IHDE. When I read that, I took the opportunity to question the IHDE further. |
Excerpts from Executive Order 13410
Section 1.
Purpose. It is the purpose of this order to ensure that
health care programs administered or sponsored by the
Federal Government promote quality and efficient delivery of
health care through the use of health information
technology, transparency regarding health care quality and
price, and better incentives for program beneficiaries,
enrollees, and providers. It is the further purpose of this
order to make relevant information available to these
beneficiaries, enrollees, and providers in a readily useable
manner and in collaboration with similar initiatives in the
private sector and non-Federal public sector. Consistent
with the purpose of improving the quality and efficiency of
health care, the actions and steps taken by Federal
Government agencies should not incur additional costs for
the Federal Government.
(a) Health Information Technology.
(1) For Federal Agencies. As each agency implements, acquires, or upgrades health information technology systems used for the direct exchange of health information between agencies and with non-Federal entities, it shall utilize, where available, health information technology systems and products that meet recognized interoperability standards.
(2) For Contracting Purposes. Each agency shall require in contracts or agreements with health care providers, health plans, or health insurance issuers that as each provider, plan, or issuer implements, acquires, or upgrades health information technology systems, it shall utilize, where available, health information technology systems and products that meet recognized interoperability standards.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|||||
Questions to IHDE:
Response from IHDE:
This is a rather misleading response. Yes, medical providers do communicate with each other - but it is a direct communication. One doctor orders a test or a procedure. When complete, the other doctor sends the results back to the ordering physician. There is no intermediary, private corporation collecting a medical record to be shared with the world - and especially, it is not available on the Internet (or it better not be). SCORECARD FOR IMPLEMENTATION The National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) is keeping the scorecard of progress towards implementation of the nationalized medical records system. You might want to check and see what your state legislature is doing about it: 2007 State Legislation on Electronic Health Records and Personal Health Records
2009
Obama - Health Care - Next Step: OBAMA HEALTH PLAN POSES DANGER TO AMERICAN FREEDOMS Refer back, October 19, 1992, Louis Sullivan Press Release |
||||||
[1] Federal
Register / Vol. 69. No. 84/Friday, April 30, 2004, pg
24059-24061, Executive Order 13335--Incentives for the use
of Health Information Technology and Establishing the
Position of the National Health Information Technology
Coordinator [2] GAO Report to the Chairman, Committee on Governmental Affairs, U.S. Senate, ‘Medical ADP Systems: Automated Medical Records Hold Promise to Improve Patient Care’, January 1991, GAO/IMTEC-91-5 http://archive.gao.gov/t2pbat8/143217.pdf [3] Office of the Secretary, Health and Human Services, HCFA Press Office, October 19, 1992, ‘Nation-Wide Electronic Health Care Information Network, http://www.os.dhhs.gov/news/press/pre1995pres/921019.txt
[4]
William J. Clinton Foundation, Press
Release on First One Hundred Days of
Presidency, White House Office of the
Press Secretary, April 25, 1993
[5] GAO Report to the Chairman, Committee on Governmental Affairs, U.S. Senate, ‘Automated Medical Records: Leadership Needed to Expedite Standards Development”, April 1993, GAO/IMTEC-93-17 http://archive.gao.gov/t2pbat5/149267.pdf [6] Mike Leavitt, Secretary of HHS, Testimony before the Committee on the Budget, United States Senate, July 20, 2005. http://www.hhs.gov/asl/testify/t050720.html
[7]
White House, Office of the Press
Secretary, April 3, 2001, 'President
Bush Announces Eleven People to Serve in
His Administration'
Related:
|
||||||
|
||||||