Several of the following articles about Global Crossing were posted on the ExecutiveCaliber website over a period of a couple years.  They provide a good memory refresher but do notice that Mr. Taylor was in the Lease Training business.  That becomes relevant when you begin to compare the Global Crossing story with the railroads and Credit Mobilier.   At the bottom, there are several other articles about Global Crossing from different sources.     

ExecutiveCaliber (Lease Training by Jeffrey Taylor)
Copyright (c) 2001-2002 All rights reserved

Global Crossing

Global Crossing, a telecommunications company, filed for Chapter 11, making it the biggest telecom flameout. Ranked by assets, Global's bankruptcy is the nation's fourth largest after Enron and Texaco.

If Global Crossing emerges from bankruptcy proceedings, investors could get shares in the reorganized company, or they could get nothing.

Morgan, their lead bank, stands to lose billions of dollars because they commonly accepted shares in Global Crossing subsidiaries as collateral for some of their loans.

The Bermuda company hopes to reorganize behind a $750 million investment from two Asian technology companies, Hutchison Whampoa and Singapore Technologies (commonly referred to as SingTel).

The two have signed a preliminary letter of intent to take a 60% interest in the reorganized company, putting the equity value of Global at $1.25 billion, a sharp contrast with Global Crossing's peak market capitalization of approximately $48 billion in 2000. The deal will essentially get Hutchison and Singapore Technologies the undersea cable network that cost Global Crossing more than $10 billion to build.

By swooping in on debt-strapped Global Crossing, Hutchinson Whampoa may be picking up another undervalued asset at a cheap price. That is because they have a $400 million convertible-bond holding in the ailing fiber-optic carrier.

Hutchison's convertible-bond holding in Global Crossing is virtually worthless today. But by putting fresh capital into Global Crossing, paring down its $12.4 billion debt load and positioning it for an expected revival in demand for broadband services, Hutchinson stands a chance to eventually double or triple the firm's $375 million investment.

Global Crossing once was considered the strongest of the challengers to AT&T and the Baby Bells who were slow in providing bandwidth to their corporate customers. The company took on billions in debt to build an undersea fiber-optic cable system that now represents 20% of all undersea capacity leaving the U.S.

Telecom executives and analysts say a number of factors, ranging from aggressive accounting to a "turnstile" of chief executives (Global Crossing had five CEOs since its founding in 1997) contributed to the company's fall.

Some analysts and investors say that Global Crossing sold capacity on its fiber-optic network and then accounted for the sales in a legal but aggressive way. The methodology was common practice throughout the telecommunications industry, and helped to fuel a run-up in stock prices through March 2000.

Back in 1997, investors reasoned that Internet-driven telecom demand would grow exponentially, and companies such as Global Crossing would do the lucrative work of laying the "pipes" over which data were sent.

The thrust of Global Crossing's original business plan was to sell capacity on its 27-country telecom network to other carriers, offering them 20-year contracts in what is known as an indefeasible right of use.

These contracts were attractive to upstart telecom firms such as Global Crossing because they could book most of the 20-year revenue upfront as one lump sum. At the same time, Global Crossing would offer to buy similar capacity in another area from the same carrier but book those costs as a capital expense, allowing it to show large revenue increases with little or no operating expenses.

A capacity glut complicated the picture. Carriers found they didn't need to lock in long-term price breaks because prices were already falling as much as 50% on a year-to-year basis.

Global Crossing's accounting practices are drawing more interest in the wake of Enron's accounting scandal. AA, which audited Enron's books, also audited Global Crossing and a number of other emerging telecom carriers, including Qwest and Level 3.

Some critics say that Global's true failing was that the company was run more as a financial and deal-making entity, and less as a telecom outfit.

Dozens of banks, led by Morgan, which lent a total of $2.25 billion to Global Crossing against shares in Global's subsidiaries, are playing a prominent role in the dissolution of the company.

Bondholders, owed some $4.4 billion, have split themselves into two groups -- depending on whether their bonds were issued by the parent or by its Frontier subsidiary.

A third group are the trade creditors, who are owed about $1.1 billion for the equipment and services they provided the telecom company. Three sit on the creditors committee: Lucent, Verizon, and Alcatel.

One of the main problems for everyone is that there doesn't seem to be much to fight over.

Global Crossing listed assets of $22.4 billion and liabilities of $12 billion when it filed Jan. 28. The only firm offer on the table to take over Global Crossing's operations came from Hutchinson Whampoa of Hong Kong, a unit of Singapore Technologies.

All these groups must basically decide whether they can recover more in liquidation or through a restructuring.

The banks find themselves in a difficult position because many of Global Crossing's assets lie offshore, making it difficult for the banks to legally enforce a claim on them.

In addition, Global Crossing raised the money at a time when even companies that didn't have investment grade ratings could borrow without posting collateral.
 

Global Crossing

Originally published April 4, 2002
Updated August 8, 2002

Excerpt:

...Global Crossing's accounting practices drew more interest in the wake of Enron's accounting scandal. AA, which audited Enron's books, also audited Global Crossing and a number of other emerging telecom carriers, including Qwest and Level 3.

Some critics say that Global's true failing was that the company was run more as a financial and deal-making entity, and less as a telecom outfit.

Lease Training Services: Global Crossing

Excerpts:

...Global Crossing's Chapter 11 filing had made it the biggest telecom flameout. Ranked by assets, Global's bankruptcy was the nation's fourth largest after Enron and Texaco.

The deal will essentially get Hutchison and Singapore Technologies the undersea cable network that cost Global Crossing more than $10 billion to build.

The deal will essentially get Hutchison and Singapore Technologies the undersea cable network that cost Global Crossing more than $10 billion to build.

By swooping in on debt-strapped Global Crossing, Hutchinson Whampoa picks up another undervalued asset at a cheap price. That is because they have a $400 million convertible-bond holding in the ailing fiber-optic carrier.

Global Crossing once was considered the strongest of the challengers to AT&T and the Baby Bells who were slow in providing bandwidth to their corporate customers. The company took on billions in debt to build an undersea fiber-optic cable system that now represents 20% of all undersea capacity leaving the U.S.

Telecom executives and analysts say a number of factors, ranging from aggressive accounting to a "turnstile" of chief executives (Global Crossing had five CEOs since its founding in 1997) contributed to the company's fall.

Some analysts and investors say that Global Crossing sold capacity on its fiber-optic network and then accounted for the sales in a legal but aggressive way. The methodology was common practice throughout the telecommunications industry, and helped to fuel a run-up in stock prices through March 2000.

Back in 1997, investors reasoned that Internet-driven telecom demand would grow exponentially, and companies such as Global Crossing would do the lucrative work of laying the "pipes" over which data were sent.

Global Crossing's accounting practices drew more interest in the wake of Enron's accounting scandal. AA, which audited Enron's books, also audited Global Crossing and a number of other emerging telecom carriers, including Qwest and Level 3.

 

Global Crossing Tied to Clinton Defense Secretary

Wes Vernon, NewsMax.com
Saturday, Feb. 16, 2002

WASHINGTON - A top Clinton administration official, former Defense Secretary William Cohen, sits on the board of Global Crossing.  This is the telecom giant that went belly up on Jan. 28 in the fourth largest bankruptcy in U.S. history, leaving a trail of inflated revenues, top executives enriching themselves, employees and shareholders holding the bag, and Arthur Andersen acting as both consultant and auditor. 

Perle: 'Prince of Darkness' in the spotlight

Asia Times
Jim Lobe

It's the latest in a series of revelations of Perle's business dealings that, at the very least, make clear why he decided against taking an official position in the administration of President George W Bush. It seems that Perle, for all his hawkishness, wants to get rich in ways that government service may not permit.
 

The Pentagon and the Federal Bureau of Investigation objected to Global Crossing’s sale to Asian investors last year because the government uses Global Crossing’s fiber optics networks and a sale would put the networks under control of the Chinese government. Global Crossing said it would pay Perle $125,000 and an additional $600,000 if the deal went through.

Hutchison Whampoa Snags Global Crossing     pdf for Chinese Army link just in case

Hutchison Whampoa, the mammoth company that runs the Panama Canal and has close ties to the Chinese army, as a new rhinestone in its crown: Global Crossing.

Along with another Asian company, Singapore Technologies, it paid $250 million today for the bankrupt fiber-optic network company - a third of the original offer.

"An outside financial advisor to Global Crossing who was called to testify at a hastily scheduled hearing early Friday said only three credible bids had been received during a lengthy auction process and that bidders were spooked by the ongoing collapse of the business," the Associated Press reported.